◆
The record is the work
Every change to code, configuration and access is attributable and retained, so evidence is a query.
Finance teams and financial firms need two things from infrastructure that are often in tension: a record that stands up to scrutiny, and a cost that stands up to the budget. Compute gives you both — a complete history of change and access, and machines and databases priced 30% under the leading cloud for the same specification, billed by the second.
Used by fintech startups, asset managers, corporate finance teams and Fortune 500 treasury functions.
What this looks like in practice
Every change to code, configuration and access is attributable and retained, so evidence is a query.
Overnight calculations on large CPU or GPU instances, billed only for the time they run, at 30% under the leading cloud.
Ledgers and reporting stores on CosmoBase at 30% under the leading cloud’s managed databases per database-hour.
Published prices, per-second billing, no commitments. The forecast is arithmetic.
The usual way to make finance infrastructure defensible is to add process and capacity, both of which cost money. The better way is a platform where the record is automatic and the capacity is billed only while it is used.
Risk and close calculations peak a few days a month. Most firms pay for that peak every day. On Compute the grid exists for the hours it is needed, on CPU or GPU instances at 30% under the leading cloud, and the record of what ran, on what code, with what inputs, is kept automatically for whoever asks later.
Payment services on Compute Instances and CosmoBase, with every change reviewed in CodeGraph before it ships.
Retrain on GPU instances as patterns shift, without keeping hardware idle in between.
Where data lives is configured and held to, so it matches what your obligations require.
Research and summarisation on AI inference, priced per token at 30% under the leading cloud’s model service for the same model.
Compared with the leading cloud's own published on-demand prices, US East. Every comparison.
The record of change and access is complete and retained, and residency and separation are configured properties. Where a regulator or client requires a specific attestation, ask us directly and we will tell you plainly whether we hold it today.
Yes. Every price is published, and usage in finance is unusually regular. Last month’s usage at this month’s prices is a reliable forecast, with no tier changes to catch you out.
In stages, with the existing arrangement still running. Batch and reporting work usually moves first, transactional systems last, each only once its replacement has run in parallel and you are satisfied.
The same platform and prices serve both. A fintech starting out uses the free allowances; a large institution adds the Enterprise support plan and separate projects per entity.
Run agents, the tools they call and the models behind them on one platform, billed by the token and the second, for less than the same work costs on the leading cloud.
Host the landing pages, attribution pipelines and onboarding flows that bring customers in, and spend less on the infrastructure than you would on the leading cloud.
Run campaign sites, personalisation, content pipelines and marketing data on one platform that costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines and models.
Run the forms, enrichment jobs, scoring models and routing that turn interest into leads, for less than the same infrastructure costs on the leading cloud.
Run CRMs, sales data, call analysis and AI assistants on one platform, priced under the leading cloud for the same machines, databases and models.
Host creator platforms, media processing, storefronts and AI tools on infrastructure that bills by the second and costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines.
Begin with one workload. Keep what you have running. Decide whether to continue once you have seen it carry something real.
No migration required to begin. Nothing to tear down if you stop.