◆
Every branch a preview
Panel builds each change into a link reviewers can open. Approval happens on the real page, not a screenshot.
Marketing now runs on software: sites that change daily, personalisation that runs on every visit, content that is drafted by models and checked by people. Compute gives marketing teams and the engineers who support them one place to run all of it, priced below the leading cloud where the comparison is like for like and billed only for what was used.
Used by in-house teams, agencies, and marketing engineering groups at Fortune 500 companies.
What this looks like in practice
Panel builds each change into a link reviewers can open. Approval happens on the real page, not a screenshot.
Draft, translate and summarise with AI inference billed per token, at 30% under the leading cloud’s model service for the same model.
Images, video and documents in Cloud Services object storage, in the same account as the sites that use them.
Published prices and per-second billing mean the infrastructure line in the marketing budget is a forecast, not a surprise.
The slowest step in most campaigns is not the idea or the creative. It is waiting for someone to stand up a site, wire a form and check the bill. When that work is a branch and a published price, the queue goes away.
A campaign site is a repository in CodeGraph, built by Panel, served on a domain registered in the same account. Reviewers get a preview link, approval is a merge, and the site is live. Nobody has to provision anything, and when the campaign is over, nobody has to remember to switch it off for the bill to stop.
Recommendation services on Compute Instances, billed by the second, so a busy launch week costs what it costs and a quiet one does not.
Translate and adapt copy across markets with AI inference, with a person still deciding what ships.
Deploy with Nexus so pages render close to visitors wherever a campaign runs.
Lifecycle and reporting data in CosmoBase, at 30% under the leading cloud’s managed databases per database-hour.
Compared with the leading cloud's own published on-demand prices, US East. Every comparison.
No. It is the cloud your marketing software runs on. Your sites, data pipelines, personalisation and AI content tooling run here; the strategy remains yours.
The day-to-day loop is a preview link and an approval, which anyone on the team can do. Setting up a site the first time is a job for someone comfortable with git.
Each client can be its own project with its own sites, domains and data, kept apart from the others, and billed so you can see exactly what each one used.
We make the 30% claim only where it holds: machines, databases, build minutes, tokens and support. Storage and bandwidth prices are published on the pricing page so you can judge them for yourself.
Run agents, the tools they call and the models behind them on one platform, billed by the token and the second, for less than the same work costs on the leading cloud.
Host the landing pages, attribution pipelines and onboarding flows that bring customers in, and spend less on the infrastructure than you would on the leading cloud.
Run the forms, enrichment jobs, scoring models and routing that turn interest into leads, for less than the same infrastructure costs on the leading cloud.
Run CRMs, sales data, call analysis and AI assistants on one platform, priced under the leading cloud for the same machines, databases and models.
Host creator platforms, media processing, storefronts and AI tools on infrastructure that bills by the second and costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines.
Run your product, its databases, CI and AI features on one platform that costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines, databases and models.
Begin with one workload. Keep what you have running. Decide whether to continue once you have seen it carry something real.
No migration required to begin. Nothing to tear down if you stop.