◆
Consolidation without compromise
Machines, databases, storage, git, DNS and support from one provider, under one set of permissions.
IT departments inherit clouds rather than choose them: an account per project, a contract per tool, a bill nobody fully understands. Compute consolidates machines, databases, storage, code hosting, DNS and support onto one platform with published prices beside the leading cloud’s own, so running the estate costs less and explaining it takes less time.
Used by IT teams in midsize businesses, managed service providers and Fortune 500 enterprises.
What this looks like in practice
Machines, databases, storage, git, DNS and support from one provider, under one set of permissions.
Projects map to departments, and every charge is itemised at a published price. Chargeback becomes a report.
Test and training machines billed by the second. When the course ends, so does the cost.
Developer, Business and Enterprise plans at 30% under the leading cloud’s support minimums, billed monthly with no term.
A large share of IT effort goes on the seams between providers: separate accounts, separate bills, separate support queues. Fewer seams means less of that work, and a lower price for the same machines means the budget goes further.
Every charge on a Compute bill is a quantity times a published price, grouped by the project that incurred it. When finance asks why spend moved, the answer is a list of projects and what they used. When they ask whether it is good value, the answer is the same list priced at the leading cloud’s published rates beside ours.
Move line-of-business systems onto Compute Instances and CosmoBase, and keep them in CodeGraph with proper review.
Bring the domain portfolio into Domains, with registration and DNS beside the systems they point at.
Internal search and assistants built on AI inference, billed per token, priced under the leading cloud’s model service for the same model.
Who can reach what is granted explicitly and kept on record, so access reviews are a lookup.
Compared with the leading cloud's own published on-demand prices, US East. Every comparison.
Yes, and most IT teams start that way. Move one department or one class of workload, compare a quarter of cost and operations, and decide on the rest from evidence.
Access is granted per project and per person, and every grant and change is recorded. Separation between environments is configured once and held to.
Ask us directly about the specific attestation your procurement requires and we will tell you plainly whether we hold it today. We will not imply one we do not have.
Pricing is the same published usage pricing for everyone, with no minimum and no term. Larger organisations usually add the Enterprise support plan for a named point of contact.
Run agents, the tools they call and the models behind them on one platform, billed by the token and the second, for less than the same work costs on the leading cloud.
Host the landing pages, attribution pipelines and onboarding flows that bring customers in, and spend less on the infrastructure than you would on the leading cloud.
Run campaign sites, personalisation, content pipelines and marketing data on one platform that costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines and models.
Run the forms, enrichment jobs, scoring models and routing that turn interest into leads, for less than the same infrastructure costs on the leading cloud.
Run CRMs, sales data, call analysis and AI assistants on one platform, priced under the leading cloud for the same machines, databases and models.
Host creator platforms, media processing, storefronts and AI tools on infrastructure that bills by the second and costs less than the leading cloud for the same machines.
Begin with one workload. Keep what you have running. Decide whether to continue once you have seen it carry something real.
No migration required to begin. Nothing to tear down if you stop.